Shared research study link

Digital Political Engagement Study - Reaching Voters Online in 2026

Understanding how voters engage with political content online and what digital messaging strategies are most effective

Study Overview Updated Jan 19, 2026
Research question: How voters engage with political content online and which digital messages drive attention and action; we asked what makes them stop scrolling, what prompts action, and which platforms they trust least and where they go for clarity.
Research group: Six U.S. voters (ages 25–50), rural‑heavy across FL/TX/NJ/GA, spanning logistics/trades, office managers, and community‑connected participants, including Spanish‑speaking households. What they said: Voters stop for content that is local, concrete, and verifiable-plain language with receipts (bill PDFs, vote tallies, budgets), clear sponsors, calm local voices, and accessible/bilingual presentation; they fast‑scroll rage‑bait, over‑produced ads, and donation‑first UX.
They take action when the ask is local, specific, and low‑friction from trusted community senders (parish/PTA/county), with a tiny task and immediate neighborhood payoff; heavy tracking kills conversions, while platform‑native microflows (Stories + calendar/Apple Pay) and bilingual access lift response for some segments.
Least‑trusted sources are algorithm‑driven short‑form feeds and cable punditry; for understanding, they default to primary documents, wire/public radio, and local reporting, using timeboxing and a “two sources + one primary doc” rule. Decision takeaways: Adopt a receipts‑by‑default standard with visible sponsor labels, and ship a steady cadence of local service content (maps/dates/costs, tradeoffs) in a measured, human tone with captions and Spanish where relevant.
Build low‑friction micro‑asks (calendar adds, prewritten comments, short forms, privacy‑light) and distribute via trusted messengers (parish, PTA, county pages), while reallocating spend away from short‑form outrage inventory toward local/news/community placements.
Track success via stop rate on service posts, micro‑ask completion, receipts/accessibility compliance, and partner‑channel lift to guide ongoing optimization.
Participant Snapshots
6 profiles
Brian Sundberg
Brian Sundberg

Brian Sundberg, 38, rural NJ healthcare operations/IT lead. Married with one child. Faith-driven, data-first, budget-conscious. Prefers reliable, low-friction tools with measurable ROI. Values family time, compliance, and predictable costs over flashy featu…

Christopher Nugra
Christopher Nugra

Christopher Nugra, 25, married in rural Florida. Spanish-first, uninsured, cash-focused. Training for HVAC while supporting family. Practical, DIY-oriented, price-sensitive. Trusts community referrals, avoids contracts, and prioritizes durable, repairable,…

Tyler Henry
Tyler Henry

Bilingual rural Ohio postal carrier, 33, Puerto Rican-born, married without kids. Practical, union-minded, and budget-focused. Prioritizes reliability, warranties, and offline functionality. Anchored in church, family ties, and steady routines.

Sonny Carrizales
Sonny Carrizales

Dallas-born, Spanish-speaking former auto parts salesman on disability. Single, community-minded, faith-forward, and careful with money. Values durability, clear pricing, bilingual support, and back-friendly convenience. Loves classic trucks, family time, a…

Cameron Chaimowitz
Cameron Chaimowitz

Cameron, 47, divorced, veteran, and regional ops lead for a Florida building-materials dealer. Practical, ROI-driven, Catholic-rooted. Rents, saves for land, relies on IHS, rides a motorcycle, fishes weekends, values reliability and honest service.

Chris Price
Chris Price

Atlanta-based higher-ed operations pro, 35, single, Black, Catholic, homeowner. Strong income via salary, consulting, and rental. Accessibility-forward with hearing loss. Pragmatic, structured, community-minded; buys for time savings, integration, and trans…

Overview 0 participants
Sex / Gender
Race / Ethnicity
Locale (Top)
Occupations (Top)
Demographic Overview No agents selected
Age bucket Male count Female count
Participant locations No agents selected
Participant Incomes US benchmark scaled to group size
Income bucket Participants US households
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 ACS 1-year (Table B19001; >$200k evenly distributed for comparison)
Media Ingestion
Connections appear when personas follow many of the same sources, highlighting overlapping media diets.
Questions and Responses
3 questions
Response Summaries
3 questions
Word Cloud
Analyzing correlations…
Generating correlations…
Taking longer than usual
Persona Correlations
Analyzing correlations…

Overview

Across 18 responses voters coalesce around pragmatic, local-first digital messaging: posts that name places, dates, routes and offer verifiable documents convert attention into action when they come from trusted local senders (churches, unions, county/.gov, known neighbors). Low-friction asks (one-click sign-ups, prewritten copy, calendar links), bilingual/accessibility signals (Spanish translations, captions), and operational detail for job-impacted audiences materially increase follow-through. Distrust of algorithmic short-form feeds and outrage-first creative is widespread; service-oriented, time-bound content (polling places, sandbag distribution, volunteer shifts) outperforms nationalized, high-emotion appeals. Occupational context determines the format of persuasion: trades/logistics and field workers demand maps, route impacts, and low-bandwidth formats, while higher-education/office-manager respondents require primary documents, line-item budgets, and citation chaining before acting.
Total responses: 18

Key Segments

Segment Attributes Insight Supporting Agents
Rural trades & logistics workers
  • occupation: logistics coordinator / sales / courier / building materials
  • locale: rural
  • age range: 30s–40s
Respond when messages include operational detail (maps, detours, route/bridge impacts, cost per household), low-bandwidth formats, and clear tradeoffs; low-friction CTAs tied to immediate job or route impacts drive action. Tyler Henry, Cameron Chaimowitz
Spanish-speaking / Hispanic community-connected voters
  • language: Spanish
  • ethnicity: Hispanic/Latino
  • trusted community ties: church/parish, neighborhood networks
Bilingual posts, Spanish captions, translated sample text and church/parish endorsements significantly increase engagement and participation for community service and relief asks. Sonny Carrizales, Christopher Nugra, Tyler Henry
Higher-education & higher-income office managers
  • education: bachelor/graduate
  • income: upper brackets ($100k+)
  • occupation: office manager / higher ed admin
Demand primary-source evidence (bill texts, budget PDFs, roll-call votes), concise data-forward presentation, and measurable, low-effort asks (poll-worker signups, precinct info); credibility signals are preconditions for engagement. Brian Sundberg, Chris Price
Faith-connected civic actors
  • religion: Evangelical Protestant or Catholic
  • trusted channels: church/parish pages and community leaders
Religious community channels substitute for formal institutional trust and effectively distribute civic asks (volunteer shifts, relief coordination, interpretation services). Sonny Carrizales, Christopher Nugra, Tyler Henry
Platform-skeptical cross-demographic group
  • all ages
  • varied incomes and locales
  • shared preference: distrust of algorithmic short-form feeds
Widespread avoidance of TikTok/Reels/X and outrage-first creative; audiences prefer straight-news sources, local outlets, and direct primary-source links regardless of demographic. Brian Sundberg, Christopher Nugra, Sonny Carrizales, Tyler Henry, Cameron Chaimowitz, Chris Price
Accessibility-conscious respondents
  • hearing loss or disability awareness
  • preference for captions, readable copy, and alt text
Captions and accessible formats are decisive engagement drivers for those with hearing or other accessibility needs; accessible posts broaden reach and reduce friction for participation. Chris Price, Christopher Nugra

Shared Mindsets

Trait Signal Agents
Local, time-bound specificity drives action Naming places, dates, routes, hearing dates and including maps or timelines creates immediate salience and a clear behavior window. Tyler Henry, Cameron Chaimowitz, Brian Sundberg, Chris Price, Sonny Carrizales
Trusted sender trumps creative flash Church/parish pages, unions, county/.gov and known neighbors convert attention into action; anonymous or out-of-area PACs do not. Sonny Carrizales, Tyler Henry, Christopher Nugra, Cameron Chaimowitz
Requirement for primary documents / receipts Screenshots of bill text, roll-call votes, budgets and PDFs increase credibility and willingness to engage or amplify. Brian Sundberg, Cameron Chaimowitz, Chris Price, Tyler Henry
Low-friction CTAs increase follow-through Prewritten emails, one-click sign-ups, calendar adds and short time commitments materially raise conversion; donation-first funnels deter action. Brian Sundberg, Tyler Henry, Chris Price, Cameron Chaimowitz
Bilingual and accessible content expands reach Spanish translations, readable captions and alt text are not optional in mixed-language communities - they materially increase participation. Sonny Carrizales, Christopher Nugra, Chris Price
Aversion to outrage-first creative across cohorts All-caps, siren emojis, jump-cut gotcha clips and overproduced ads trigger fast scrolling and reduce credibility across demographics. Brian Sundberg, Cameron Chaimowitz, Tyler Henry, Chris Price, Sonny Carrizales

Divergences

Segment Contrast Agents
Younger respondent with document-first behavior Christopher Nugra (age 25) emphasizes primary documents and verification behaviour more typical of older, document-oriented respondents-suggests age is not the sole predictor of document-demanding behavior. Christopher Nugra
Accessibility-driven vs general audience design Chris Price's explicit hearing-loss-driven preference for captions highlights that accessibility needs can change preferred media formats (captions, transcript) even when broader groups dislike short-form video. Chris Price
Operational detail preference vs data-forward preference Rural trades/logistics respondents prioritize maps, detours, and low-bandwidth formats for immediate job impact, while higher-education/office-manager respondents prioritize primary documents, budgets, and citations-both reduce friction but require different content packaging. Tyler Henry, Cameron Chaimowitz, Brian Sundberg, Chris Price
Faith-channel trust vs institutional trust Faith-connected voters accept church/parish endorsement as sufficient credibility for civic asks, whereas other segments (higher-edu, data-focused) require formal documents and .gov sources-messaging must map sender to audience. Sonny Carrizales, Christopher Nugra, Brian Sundberg
Creating recommendations…
Generating recommendations…
Taking longer than usual
Recommendations & Next Steps
Preparing recommendations…

Overview

Focus group findings are clear: digital political content wins attention and action when it is local, concrete, and verifiable. That means posts that name places/dates/costs, show receipts (bill PDFs, roll-call votes, maps), use calm local voices, and are accessible (captions, readable graphics, bilingual where relevant). Conversion improves with low-friction, time-bound micro-asks (calendar add, prewritten email) delivered via trusted community channels (parish, PTA, county pages). Outrage-first creative, donation-first funnels, and tracker-heavy ads drive fast scrolls and drop-offs. Action plan: ship a receipts-by-default system, a local service-content pipeline, accessibility/bilingual standards, low-friction CTA infrastructure, a trusted messenger network, and a platform mix that deprioritizes algorithmic short-form outrage in favor of local/news and community distribution.

Quick Wins (next 2–4 weeks)

# Action Why Owner Effort Impact
1 Add a visible 'Source & receipts' block to every post Primary docs and clear sponsorship are strong trust signals; absence triggers fast scrolls. Policy/Research Lead Low High
2 Mandate captions, alt text, and bilingual microcopy where relevant Accessibility and Spanish-language support materially increase attention and conversions. Content & Accessibility Lead Low High
3 Swap donation-first funnels for service-first, low-friction CTAs Rage-bait and payment traps kill conversions; micro-asks with calendar adds drive action. Growth/CRM Lead Med High
4 Ship 3 local templates (Map+Dates, Cost-per-Household, Before/After) Concrete, screenshot-friendly assets align with what makes people stop and share. Design Lead Low Med
5 Place a clear sponsor/paid-for-by label at the top of ads/posts Transparent sponsorship boosts credibility and reduces suspicion of anonymous PACs. Compliance & Ads Lead Low Med
6 Rebalance media spend away from algorithmic short-form outrage Short-form/trending feeds are least trusted; local/news and community placements convert better. Media/Ads Lead Med High

Initiatives (30–90 days)

# Initiative Description Owner Timeline Dependencies
1 Receipts Everywhere: policy + CMS module Implement a publishing rule and lightweight CMS widget that enforces a Source & receipts block (links to bill PDFs, roll-call votes, budget lines) and clear sponsor labeling on every asset. Auto-check for missing captions/alt text before publish. Policy/Research Lead + Engineering/Martech 2–4 weeks to MVP, then ongoing Legal/compliance review of disclaimers, CMS integration, Source-link library setup
2 Local Service-Content Pipeline Stand up a weekly cadence of local, time-bound posts (maps, dates, costs, who-to-contact) distributed via trusted community channels (parish, PTA, county pages). Use calm local voices and unscripted Q&A. Content Lead + Community Partnerships 4 weeks to pilot in 3 priority geos; scale by week 8 Geo prioritization and content templates, Community partner agreements, Design bandwidth
3 Low-Friction Action Infrastructure Build micro-ask flows: one-tap calendar add (ICS/Google), prewritten emails for public comments, short forms (≤3 fields), optional wallet checkout for permitted donations, and privacy-light defaults. Engineering/Martech + Growth 6 weeks to MVP; 12 weeks to full rollout Legal/privacy review, Calendar/SMS integrations, Payments processor (where applicable)
4 Accessibility & Bilingual Standards Rollout Codify and enforce standards: human-reviewed captions, readable contrast, alt text, and Spanish copy in mixed-language zip codes. Add QA checklist and spot-audits. Accessibility Lead + Content QA 3 weeks to rollout; audits monthly Captioning/transcription vendor or tooling, Translation resources, QA process
5 Trusted Messenger Network Recruit/train local validators (faith leaders, union stewards, school/PTA, small biz owners). Provide co-branded templates and a link kit with receipts to distribute through their channels. Community Partnerships 8 weeks to 50 active messengers; expand quarterly Outreach list and incentives, Brand/co-brand guidelines, Legal guidance for endorsements
6 Platform Mix and Media Reallocation Deprioritize X/TikTok-style outrage inventory; shift budget to local news sponsorships, public radio/podcasts with transcripts, community Facebook/Nextdoor placements, and search for service queries (e.g., early voting hours). Media/Ads Lead 2 weeks to plan; 1 month to fully reallocate Performance baselines by channel, Inventory/partner negotiations, Creative resizing for new placements

KPIs to Track

# KPI Definition Target Frequency
1 Stop rate on local service posts Percentage of impressions resulting in ≥3s dwell or expand on posts with map/dates/costs vs generic political posts +30% vs baseline within 6 weeks Weekly
2 CTA completion rate (micro-asks) Share of users who complete primary micro-task (calendar add, prewritten email send, RSVP) after landing ≥8% on service posts; ≥12% in partner channels Weekly
3 Receipts coverage Percent of published assets with a visible Source & receipts block and sponsor label 100% by week 4 Weekly
4 Accessibility/Bilingual compliance Percent of video assets with accurate captions and posts with alt text; percent of posts translated in target bilingual zip codes Captions/alt text 100%; Translation ≥80% in target zips Bi-weekly
5 Community channel lift Conversion rate and traffic share from trusted partner distributions (parish/PTA/county pages) vs paid social ≥1.5x conversion vs paid social; ≥25% of conversions via partners by week 12 Weekly
6 Privacy/UX health Average form fields per funnel, opt-out/unsubscribe rate within 7 days, and complaint/spam reports ≤3 fields; opt-outs ≤5%; spam reports ≤0.5% Monthly

Risks & Mitigations

# Risk Mitigation Owner
1 Legal/compliance missteps on political disclaimers, payments, or endorsements Pre-publish legal review, standardized disclaimers, and payments compliance checklist; train messengers on do/don’t Legal/Compliance
2 Inaccurate maps, costs, or dates erode trust Two-sources + one primary-doc rule; QA sign-off; publish corrections transparently within 24 hours Policy/Research + Content QA
3 Resource strain creating localized, bilingual content at scale Template library, geo-prioritization, contractor bench for translation/captioning, and phased rollout Content Lead
4 Backlash from reduced presence on algorithmic short-form platforms Maintain lightweight listening posts, post service content only, and redirect discovery to owned channels Media/Ads Lead
5 Partner message drift or off-brand posts by messengers Provide co-branded kits, office hours, and a light MOU; monitor and coach vs police Community Partnerships
6 Auto-caption errors or poor Spanish translations Human review for priority posts, approved glossary, and periodic audits with native speakers Accessibility Lead

Timeline

Weeks 0–2: Audit & foundations - receipts policy live, caption/alt standards, sponsor labels; media reallocation plan drafted.

Weeks 3–6: Pilots - Local service-content in 3 geos; low-friction CTA MVP (calendar add, prewritten emails); initial partner posts via parish/PTA/county pages.

Weeks 7–12: Scale - Expand to 8–10 geos; grow messenger network to 50+; broaden translations; shift 30–40% media to local/news/community placements.

Weeks 13+: Optimize - A/B test templates, refine geo mix, expand partner kits, and automate QA checks; quarterly review of KPIs and spend.
Research Study Narrative

Digital Political Engagement Study - Executive Synthesis

Objective and context. To prepare for 2026, we analyzed how voters engage with political content online and which digital messaging strategies convert attention into action. Across 18 responses spanning three lines of inquiry, the signal is consistent: people engage when content is local, concrete, and verifiable-and they act when the ask is specific, low-friction, and delivered by trusted community senders.

What earns attention in feeds. Respondents stop for posts that name places, dates, costs, and tradeoffs; visibly “show the work” (links to bill PDFs, roll-call votes, budget lines); and use calm, unscripted local voices. Accessibility is a trust signal: captions, readable graphics, and bilingual copy increase dwell (Chris Price; Christopher Nugra). Conversely, outrage-first creative, over-produced spots, AI/stock footage, and donation-first UX trigger fast scrolling (Christopher Nugra; Sonny Carrizales). A practical playbook emerged: 1) show receipts; 2) specify local impact (maps, detours, timelines); 3) use measured, recognizable messengers; 4) avoid theatrical production and fundraise-first funnels (Brian Sundberg; Cameron Chaimowitz; Sonny Carrizales).

What converts attention into action. Action follows when there’s an immediate local payoff and a tiny, explicit task. Trusted senders-parish/PTA pages, county/.gov, known neighbors-outperform anonymous PACs (Christopher Nugra; Sonny Carrizales). Low-friction flows (≤3 fields, prewritten emails, one-tap calendar adds, optional wallet) and time-bound prompts raise completion (Brian Sundberg; Chris Price). Heavy tracking, data capture, and outrage framing suppress conversion (“data trap” avoidance; Cameron Chaimowitz). For some, platform-native microformats dramatically accelerate action (Instagram Stories → auto calendar + Apple Pay; Chris Price). Bilingual assets materially increase response where Spanish is prevalent (Christopher Nugra).

Trust landscape and verification behavior. Respondents distrust algorithmic, short-form feeds (TikTok/Reels, X trending) and cable primetime punditry for politics, citing adrenaline-over-clarity dynamics and decontextualized clips (Cameron Chaimowitz). To understand issues, they default to primary documents and official records, layer in wire services/public radio/C‑SPAN for low-spin baselines, and add local reporting for on-the-ground detail-often timeboxing and applying a “two sources + one primary doc” rule to avoid outrage loops (Brian Sundberg).

Persona correlations and nuances. • Rural trades/logistics: respond to maps, detours, bridge/route limits, cost-per-household; prefer low-bandwidth, job-impact detail (Tyler Henry; Cameron Chaimowitz). • Spanish-speaking/Hispanic community-connected: engagement jumps with bilingual posts and parish endorsements (Sonny Carrizales; Christopher Nugra). • Higher-ed/office managers: demand receipts (bill text, budgets, roll-calls) and concise, measurable asks (Brian Sundberg; Chris Price). • Faith-connected civic actors: church/parish credibility substitutes for institutional trust for service asks. • Accessibility-conscious: captions/readable copy are decisive. Notably, younger participants can be document-first (Christopher Nugra), underscoring behavior over age.

Recommendations (grounded in observed behavior).

  • Receipts by default: Add a visible “Source & receipts” block and clear sponsor label to every asset; enforce pre-publish checks for captions/alt text.
  • Local service content: Ship weekly, time-bound posts with maps, dates, costs, and who-to-contact; feature measured, local voices and unscripted Q&A.
  • Low-friction micro-asks: Build one-tap calendar adds (ICS/Google), prewritten emails for comments, ≤3-field forms, optional wallet; adopt privacy-light defaults.
  • Accessibility/bilingual standards: Mandate captions, readable contrast, alt text, and Spanish copy in mixed-language zips; QA with spot audits.
  • Trusted messenger network: Equip parish/PTA/union/small-biz messengers with co-branded templates and link kits to distribute through their channels.

Risks and guardrails. • Compliance missteps on disclaimers/payments/endorsements → mitigate via legal pre-publish checks and standardized labels. • Inaccurate maps/dates/costs erode trust → enforce “two sources + one primary doc,” QA sign-off, and transparent corrections within 24 hours. • Scale strain for localized/bilingual content → template library, geo prioritization, and a translation/captioning bench.

Next steps and measurement.

  1. Weeks 0–2: Turn on receipts/captions/sponsor standards; stand up template library (Map+Dates, Cost-per-Household, Before/After); draft media reallocation away from algorithmic short-form outrage toward local/news/community placements.
  2. Weeks 3–6: Pilot local service-content in 3 geos; launch micro-ask MVP (calendar add, prewritten email); begin partner distribution via parish/PTA/county pages.
  3. Weeks 7–12: Scale to 8–10 geos; recruit 50 active messengers; expand translations; optimize flows per KPIs.

KPIs (with targets): • Stop rate on service posts: +30% vs baseline in 6 weeks. • CTA completion (micro-asks): ≥8% overall; ≥12% in partner channels. • Receipts coverage: 100% by week 4. • Accessibility/bilingual compliance: captions/alt text 100%; translations ≥80% in target zips. • Community channel lift: ≥1.5x conversion vs paid social; ≥25% of conversions via partners by week 12.

Recommended Follow-up Questions Updated Jan 19, 2026
  1. Which types of senders do you find most and least credible for political information online? Please evaluate items such as: local government agency, city/county department, school/PTA, local nonprofit, union, local journalist, neighbor/community member, candidate, party committee, PAC, faith leader, issue expert/academic.
    maxdiff Identifies the most credible messengers to feature in creative and sender lines, improving trust and conversion.
  2. How receptive are you to political messages delivered through each channel? Please rate: social feed ads, direct messages (Messenger/DM), email newsletters, SMS/text, WhatsApp/Signal, local news websites, community forums/groups, podcast host‑read ads, YouTube pre‑roll, connected TV/streaming ads.
    matrix Guides channel mix and budget allocation toward high‑receptivity placements and away from low‑yield channels.
  3. Which content formats help you understand a political message the fastest? Please rank: short plain‑text post, image with caption, 15–30s video, 60–120s explainer video, multi‑card carousel/Story, interactive map, link preview to an official document.
    rank Prioritizes creative formats that maximize quick comprehension for limited attention windows.
  4. How likely are you to complete each type of online political ask when prompted? Please rate: sign a petition, RSVP to a local event, add a date to calendar, share a post with a friend, email a representative, call a representative, complete a short survey, make a small‑dollar donation via Apple/Google Pay, submit a volunteer interest form.
    matrix Focuses call‑to‑action design on the highest‑yield asks to improve conversion rates.
  5. How comfortable are you sharing each type of information with a political sender online? Please rate: email address, ZIP code, full address, phone number, age, party registration, language preference, approximate location permission, cookies/retargeting consent, payment info for donation.
    matrix Sets data‑collection minimums and privacy signals to reduce form abandonment and distrust.
  6. When are you most open to noticing and considering political content online? Select all that apply: early morning (6–9am), mid‑morning, lunch (11am–2pm), late afternoon, early evening (6–9pm), late night, weekend mornings, weekend afternoons, during work breaks, commuting.
    multi select Optimizes dayparting and scheduling to reach voters when receptivity is highest.
Ensure sample size supports MaxDiff stability; consider quota balancing by age, locale, and language to test heterogeneity in channel and messenger preferences.
Study Overview Updated Jan 19, 2026
Research question: How voters engage with political content online and which digital messages drive attention and action; we asked what makes them stop scrolling, what prompts action, and which platforms they trust least and where they go for clarity.
Research group: Six U.S. voters (ages 25–50), rural‑heavy across FL/TX/NJ/GA, spanning logistics/trades, office managers, and community‑connected participants, including Spanish‑speaking households. What they said: Voters stop for content that is local, concrete, and verifiable-plain language with receipts (bill PDFs, vote tallies, budgets), clear sponsors, calm local voices, and accessible/bilingual presentation; they fast‑scroll rage‑bait, over‑produced ads, and donation‑first UX.
They take action when the ask is local, specific, and low‑friction from trusted community senders (parish/PTA/county), with a tiny task and immediate neighborhood payoff; heavy tracking kills conversions, while platform‑native microflows (Stories + calendar/Apple Pay) and bilingual access lift response for some segments.
Least‑trusted sources are algorithm‑driven short‑form feeds and cable punditry; for understanding, they default to primary documents, wire/public radio, and local reporting, using timeboxing and a “two sources + one primary doc” rule. Decision takeaways: Adopt a receipts‑by‑default standard with visible sponsor labels, and ship a steady cadence of local service content (maps/dates/costs, tradeoffs) in a measured, human tone with captions and Spanish where relevant.
Build low‑friction micro‑asks (calendar adds, prewritten comments, short forms, privacy‑light) and distribute via trusted messengers (parish, PTA, county pages), while reallocating spend away from short‑form outrage inventory toward local/news/community placements.
Track success via stop rate on service posts, micro‑ask completion, receipts/accessibility compliance, and partner‑channel lift to guide ongoing optimization.