Shared research study link

Eldercare Pain Discovery: Adult Children Perspective

Identify the most significant pain points, frustrations, and unmet needs experienced by adult children who are managing care for aging parents. Discover where the biggest opportunities lie for new solutions.

Study Overview Updated Jan 31, 2026
Research question: Identify the most significant pain points, frustrations, and unmet needs of adult children managing care for aging parents, and where the biggest solution opportunities lie.
Research group: 12 U.S. caregivers aged ~45–65 (rural and urban, English/Spanish bilingual mix; local and long‑distance; varied incomes/occupations) actively coordinating medications, appointments, logistics, and finances. What they said: They act as invisible, unpaid case managers because there is no single owner in healthcare; top drags are administrative sludge (portals, phone trees, prior auths), fragile medication/refill chains, and chronic mental load/vigilance.
Distance, uneven family help, language/device gaps, and rural connectivity add risk; most counter with paper-first binders, simple routines, a tiny circle of trusted humans (pharmacist, one MA, neighbors), and avoidance of brittle gadgets.
Outliers highlighted transnational PR logistics, seasonal/weather constraints, and engineering‑style home safety retrofits, with some asking for house‑call capability or a universal caregiver credential. Main insights: Highest-value opportunity is a single named, accountable human coordinator-phone/WhatsApp-first, bilingual, offline-tolerant-with authority and SLAs to own meds (reconciliation, refills, prior auths/72‑hour bridges), scheduling/transport, and billing follow-through; stand‑alone apps are rejected.
Decision takeaways: Launch a human‑in‑the‑loop control‑tower pilot with measurable outcomes (hours saved, refill‑gap rate, prior‑auth cycle time), design offline‑first artifacts (one‑page med list, printable summaries), guarantee Spanish support, and price in clear tiers (~$50–120 basic, $150–300 control‑tower, $300–600 concierge) with month‑to‑month terms and SLA credits, ideally subsidized by payers.
Participant Snapshots
12 profiles
David Gutierrez
David Gutierrez

David Gutierrez, 50, married father in suburban Reno, is a bilingual, non-citizen long-term resident, senior risk operations manager. Analytical and ROI-driven, he values reliability and clear specs, budgets carefully, and spends weekends on DIY, gardening,…

Gregory Perez
Gregory Perez

Gregory Perez, 61, is a bilingual senior account executive in Provo, UT, married with no children. Works from home, travels monthly, rents by choice, tech-savvy and pragmatic; values durability, clear pricing, real warranties, and respectful bilingual support.

Joe Deascentis
Joe Deascentis

58-year-old rural Pennsylvania structural engineer Joe Deascentis, married without children. High-income, home paid off, privacy-focused, craft-oriented. Values durability, serviceability, and clear evidence. Leads teams, mentors, cooks at home, cycles, and…

Jennifer Kohl
Jennifer Kohl

Jennifer Kohl is a practical, faith-centered 52-year-old homemaker in rural Tennessee. Married with a teen son, owns her home, uses public coverage for care, and favors durable, clearly priced products backed by human support and neighborly recommendations.

May Miller
May Miller

May Miller, 57, is a rural Georgia CPA and firm partner. Married, childfree, faith-led, practical. Values reliability, service, and time savings. Works from a barn office, loves gardening, SEC football, and neighborly community.

Jolynn Pitts
Jolynn Pitts

Paula, 61, is a practical, community-minded Carrollton renter. Married without children, she budgets carefully, volunteers weekly, cooks at home, prefers reliability over novelty, and appreciates honest pricing, clear instructions, and responsive, human cus…

Jill Correa
Jill Correa

Jill Correa, 48, is a bilingual East LA school aide and mom of two. Practical, community-minded, and faith-rooted, she budgets carefully, carpools, cooks big Sunday pots, and steadily pursues her BA to become a teacher.

Teresa Aguirre
Teresa Aguirre

Teresa Aguirre is a 62-year-old bilingual legal operations leader in rural Illinois. Married, childfree household. Prioritizes risk-adjusted value, transparent terms, and durability. Hybrid work, Catholic, community-involved. Uses public CHAMPVA coverage vi…

Christine Ray
Christine Ray

Christine Ray, pragmatic 57-year-old rural Iowa retail inventory manager. Married, no kids at home, mortgage-free. Values reliability, clear data, and total cost of ownership. Balances regional travel with property upkeep, family support, and simple, low-fu…

Charlotte Muneton
Charlotte Muneton

Puerto Rican, 51, married, Spanish-first, and disabled in Davie town, FL. Former community-engagement professional. High household income, home paid off. Values accessibility, reliability, and low-friction services; schedules around heat and fatigue.

Kevin Thayer
Kevin Thayer

Seasoned aerospace engineering manager in Plano, 59, divorced and child-free. Pragmatic, dry-witted, and community-minded. Rides a motorcycle, mentors robotics, cooks Tex-Mex, budgets carefully, favors reliability, and makes decisions based on data and tota…

Tracy Mcfarlin
Tracy Mcfarlin

Tracy McFarlin, 45, is a divorced Jacksonville stylist and mom of two. Budget-savvy, community-minded, and practical, she bikes to her salon suite, values durability and time savings, and favors clear, flexible offerings over hype.

Overview 0 participants
Sex / Gender
Race / Ethnicity
Locale (Top)
Occupations (Top)
Demographic Overview No agents selected
Age bucket Male count Female count
Participant locations No agents selected
Participant Incomes US benchmark scaled to group size
Income bucket Participants US households
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 ACS 1-year (Table B19001; >$200k evenly distributed for comparison)
Media Ingestion
Connections appear when personas follow many of the same sources, highlighting overlapping media diets.
Questions and Responses
7 questions
Response Summaries
7 questions
Word Cloud
Analyzing correlations…
Generating correlations…
Taking longer than usual
Persona Correlations
Analyzing correlations…

Overview

Adult‑child caregivers in this sample operate as unpaid, pragmatic case managers who absorb system friction, hold medication reliability together, and shoulder a chronic mental load. The dominant pain points are fragmented ownership across providers/insurers/pharmacies, medication fragility (refill cliffs and prior authorizations), and the 24/7 cognitive burden (nighttime scenario‑running, guilt, sleep erosion). Across demographics the highest‑value opportunity is a human‑centered, offline‑tolerant coordination model: a named, accountable coordinator with clear SLAs who can act locally (or dispatch/localize help), own medication and appointment authority, and surface transparent pricing/support for billing disputes. How that model is delivered (paper‑first vs. digital, bilingual/voice vs. text, subscription vs. a la carte) depends heavily on locale, language/cultural norms, distance and income.
Total responses: 84

Key Segments

Segment Attributes Insight Supporting Agents
Rural, mid‑late 50s, female caregivers (church‑connected)
  • age: mid‑50s
  • locale: rural
  • gender: female
  • social: strong church/neighborhood networks
  • work: stay‑at‑home or stable local work
  • preferences: paper‑first, low‑tech
These caregivers prioritize trusted local, relational supports and low‑tech artifacts (binders, printed med lists). They tolerate modest out‑of‑pocket spending for reliable, local help but are skeptical of subscription tech that assumes strong connectivity. Solutions should be paper‑compatible, networked into local institutions (church, pharmacy), and offer a local human coordinator with in‑person capabilities and clear, small‑ticket pricing. May Miller, Jennifer Kohl, Tracy Mcfarlin
Bilingual Hispanic caregivers (urban/suburban, transnational ties)
  • language: Spanish primary or bilingual
  • locale: urban/suburban with multi‑state/transnational ties
  • roles: translator/administrator across systems
  • platforms: WhatsApp, FaceTime preferred
  • work: mixed (teacher aide, compliance, paid caregiver)
Language and cross‑border logistics shape workflows - these caregivers act as translators/mediators and rely on voice/instant messaging channels. They explicitly want bilingual human coordinators and voice‑first flows; digital solutions must support WhatsApp/FaceTime style communication and respect family divisions of labor (e.g., administrative vs. hands‑on roles). Teresa Aguirre, Charlotte Muneton, Jill Correa, Gregory Perez
Higher‑income, technical/engineer male caregivers
  • occupation: engineer / technical professions
  • education: bachelor+
  • income: $150k+
  • mindset: project‑management, metric oriented
  • preferences: measurable outcomes, SLAs, technical robustness
These caregivers treat care as a project: they value measurement, repeatable processes, and robustness (offline operation, low false alarms). They are willing to pay for demonstrable outcomes and demand SLAs, metrics and month‑to‑month contractual flexibility. Productization should offer measurable KPIs, transparent performance reporting and optional technical integrations rather than consumer gadgetry. Joe Deascentis, Kevin Thayer, Gregory Perez
Mid‑income service/education workers balancing childcare/work
  • occupation: teacher aide, hair stylist, classroom support
  • income: $50–74k
  • family: active parenting responsibilities
  • preferences: simple, predictable routines
Time scarcity and juggling dependability are paramount. These caregivers adopt simple weekly routines (pill boxes, Sunday prep) and distrust brittle multi‑tap apps. Affordable, low‑cognitive coordination that guarantees predictable evening/weekend relief will be highly valued - price and simplicity trump advanced features. Tracy Mcfarlin, Jill Correa, Jolynn Pitts
Long‑distance / remote caregivers
  • distance: >200 miles in many cases
  • constraints: full‑time work and travel
  • needs: reliable local proxies and visual verification
Distance creates an acute emotional tax: panic when local contacts don’t respond and dependence on neighbors/paid locals. The ideal solution is a locally‑based, named coordinator who can act physically and provide timely, trusted reporting (photos, short video checks) through channels the family already uses. Gregory Perez, David Gutierrez, Charlotte Muneton
Caregivers with elevated incomes willing to pay for outcomes
  • income: $100k+
  • occupation: professionals/managers
  • willingness_to_pay: higher conditional on outcomes
Higher‑income caregivers are price‑sensitive to value: they will pay materially for a named coordinator who demonstrably reduces time and after‑hours risk, but they demand SLAs, proof of impact and flexible billing (no opaque long‑term subscriptions). Offer tiered, outcome‑guaranteed services with clear remediation policies. Gregory Perez, Kevin Thayer, Joe Deascentis, David Gutierrez

Shared Mindsets

Trait Signal Agents
Fragmented systems with no single owner Nearly every caregiver acts as the 'glue' between providers, insurers and pharmacies; administrative spikes usually stem from this lack of ownership. Teresa Aguirre, Christine Ray, David Gutierrez, Gregory Perez, Kevin Thayer
Medication fragility as a recurring failure mode Refill cliffs, prior authorizations and formulary shocks produce near‑misses and missed doses; caregivers create manual workarounds (bridge fills, pill packs) to mitigate risk. Jennifer Kohl, Charlotte Muneton, Jill Correa, Tracy Mcfarlin
Paper‑first artifacts as authoritative single source of truth When digital systems fail (2FA, timeouts, poor connectivity), caregivers default to printed one‑pagers and binders and treat them as the canonical care record. Christine Ray, Jennifer Kohl, Joe Deascentis, Tracy Mcfarlin
High value placed on local, relational networks Neighbors, church groups, trusted pharmacists or named medical assistants are repeatedly valued more than impersonal tech products. May Miller, Jill Correa, Gregory Perez, Tracy Mcfarlin
Skepticism toward wearables and always‑on gadgets Wearables and smart home devices fail due to stigma, charging burdens, false alarms or privacy concerns; caregivers prefer low‑maintenance, reliable interventions. Joe Deascentis, Charlotte Muneton, Tracy Mcfarlin, Kevin Thayer
Clear preference for a single, accountable human coordinator Across demographics the top requested solution is a named, reachable person with authority to resolve prior auths, consolidate meds/appointments and secure reliable rides - consistently ranked above standalone apps. Jennifer Kohl, Joe Deascentis, Gregory Perez, Teresa Aguirre, May Miller

Divergences

Segment Contrast Agents
Rural paper‑first caregivers vs. Urban bilingual app‑messaging workflows Rural caregivers favor paper artifacts, in‑person local networks and low‑tech fixes; bilingual urban caregivers rely on WhatsApp/FaceTime and need bilingual, voice‑first coordination. Solutions must accommodate both paper‑first offline workflows and instant messaging/voice channels. May Miller, Jennifer Kohl, Teresa Aguirre, Charlotte Muneton
Engineer/project‑management caregivers vs. Mid‑income routine‑seeking caregivers Engineers demand measurable outcomes, SLAs and technical robustness and are willing to pay for metricized services; mid‑income caregivers prioritize simplicity, predictable time savings and affordability over instrumentation. Joe Deascentis, Kevin Thayer, Gregory Perez, Tracy Mcfarlin, Jill Correa
Long‑distance caregivers vs. Local hands‑on caregivers Remote caregivers need reliable local actors and trustworthy visual/status reporting to reduce anxiety; local caregivers rely more on physical presence and neighborhood networks to solve immediate tasks. Gregory Perez, David Gutierrez, Charlotte Muneton, May Miller
Higher‑income willingness to pay vs. Skepticism of subscription tech Affluent caregivers will pay for outcome‑guaranteed coordination with SLAs and flexible billing; many others are skeptical of ongoing subscriptions and prefer pay‑per‑task or modest fees tied to concrete time savings. Gregory Perez, Kevin Thayer, Joe Deascentis, Tracy Mcfarlin
Creating recommendations…
Generating recommendations…
Taking longer than usual
Recommendations & Next Steps
Preparing recommendations…

Overview

Caregivers act as unpaid case managers battling a fragmented system with brittle meds, portals, and prior-auth ping-pong. They prefer phone-first, bilingual humans, paper backups, and accountable ownership over new apps. For Claude, the highest-ROI path is a human-in-the-loop control tower that owns meds, scheduling/transport, and billing follow-through, delivered via voice/text/WhatsApp with offline-friendly printable artifacts. Build trust with named coordinators + SLAs, Spanish support, and visible receipts (timestamps, summaries). Start narrow with a pilot that proves hours saved, fewer refill cliffs, and faster prior-auth closures, then expand.

Quick Wins (next 2–4 weeks)

# Action Why Owner Effort Impact
1 Care Binder + One-Page Med List Generator (EN/ES) Paper-first artifacts are the caregiver’s single source of truth; clinics read them and they work offline. Product + Design Low High
2 Refill Cliff Alerts + 72-hr Bridge Scripts Late-Friday refill failures drive unsafe workarounds; 7–10 day early pings and ready-made fax/call scripts prevent gaps. Clinical Ops + Eng Low High
3 Phone/WhatsApp Intake with named coordinator and Spanish option Caregivers reject portals; they want a direct line, quick callbacks, and WhatsApp/voice for remote and bilingual families. Ops Low High
4 Evidence Trail Pack Timestamps, case numbers, and printable summaries shut down front-desk disputes and reduce rework. Product Low Med
5 Pre-visit Prep Sheet + Post-visit One-Pager (EN/ES) Plain-language instructions reduce confusion and eliminate portal scavenger hunts. Content + Design Low Med
6 Go-bag + Neighbor Card Kit Low-tech readiness (IDs, med list, call tree) addresses top anxieties: ER chaos, outages, and remote check-ins. Content Low Med

Initiatives (30–90 days)

# Initiative Description Owner Timeline Dependencies
1 Named Care Coordinator Pilot (Control Tower) Launch a 90-day pilot with named, bilingual coordinators who own meds, prior-auths, scheduling/transport, and billing follow-through. Phone/WhatsApp-first with SLAs and weekly plain updates. Target 50–100 households across two locales (e.g., urban bilingual + suburban/rural). Ops + Product 0–90 days pilot; 90–180 days scale to 3–5 markets Hiring/training playbook (EN/ES), Legal/consent + HIPAA program, Local clinic/pharmacy relationships, Telephony/WhatsApp setup
2 Medication Ops Engine Tooling + process to maintain one reconciled med list, trigger refills 7–10 days early, pre-flight prior-auths, and secure same-day 72-hr bridges. Auto-generate fax covers, script templates, and printable updates. Eng + Clinical Ops Design 0–45 days; MVP 60–90 days Fax/email automation, Template library (bridge, PA, shortage swaps), Caregiver authority workflows (POA/HIPAA)
3 Scheduling & Transport Orchestration Coordinator workflows to book stackable morning slots, confirm accessibility (wheelchair notes), and arrange rides with 15–30 min windows and backup plans. Push confirmations by SMS/WhatsApp and mail paper packets on request. Ops Build playbooks 0–45 days; live in pilot day 46+ Partner: local ride vendors/Uber Health/volunteer networks, Clinic front-desk contacts, Standard message templates (EN/ES)
4 Bilingual Comms Rail (Phone/WhatsApp/SMS + Mail) Stand up a communication backbone: WhatsApp Business API, phone IVR with human callbacks, templated EN/ES summaries, and mail fulfillment for binder updates. No new logins required. Eng + Ops 0–60 days Telephony vendor (call recording + audit logs), WhatsApp Business approval, Mail-merge + print partner
5 Billing/EOB Reconciliation Assistant Capture EOBs/bills, auto-compare, flag mismatches, and generate dispute letters. Coordinator closes loops with offices; caregiver gets a one-page “what you owe.” Product + Ops Scoping 0–30 days; MVP 60–90 days Document intake (scan/upload/mail), Dispute templates (EN/ES), Ops training on payer codes

KPIs to Track

# KPI Definition Target Frequency
1 Caregiver hours saved Self-reported hours of admin/logistics offloaded per household per month; triangulated by tasks closed by coordinator. >= 3 hours saved by day 60; >= 5 by day 120 Monthly
2 Refill gap rate Percent of member-months with a missed dose due to refill/PA/stock failures. < 2% by day 90; < 1% by day 180 Monthly
3 Prior-auth cycle time Median business days from initiation to approval or bridge; 95th percentile reported. Median ≤ 3 days; P95 ≤ 7 days Weekly
4 SLA adherence Percent of contacts with ≤1 hr callback and standard-item resolution in ≤48 hrs. ≥ 90% callback; ≥ 85% resolution Weekly
5 Spanish-first task completion Share of Spanish-language households with EN/ES summaries, calls, and forms completed without rework. ≥ 95% Monthly
6 Net outcomes score Composite of NPS + reduction in off-hours escalations per household-month. NPS ≥ 50; off-hours escalations ↓ 40% by day 120 Monthly

Risks & Mitigations

# Risk Mitigation Owner
1 Insufficient legal authority to act on caregiver’s behalf across providers/insurers Standardize POA/HIPAA/proxy capture; issue a caregiver credential packet; keep signed releases on file and attach to each outreach. Legal/Compliance
2 Human coordinator cost structure doesn’t scale Tiered service (basic vs. control tower), ops tooling for repeatable tasks, focused geographies, and clear SLAs to avoid over-service. Ops + Finance
3 Dependency on brittle external systems (fax, portals, pharmacy stock) Design offline-first workflows (fax/phone kits), early refill triggers, and alternative pharmacy playbooks with dose-equivalency templates. Ops
4 Trust/adoption barriers (portal fatigue, prior bad experiences) Phone/WhatsApp-first, named coordinator, EN/ES summaries, visible receipts (timestamps/case #s), month-to-month, and credits when SLAs miss. Product Marketing + Ops
5 Weekend/after-hours coverage burnout On-call rotations, clear escalation criteria, crisis-only coverage windows, and surge pricing for heavy months to fund staffing. Ops
6 PHI security/privacy incidents HIPAA program, least-privilege access, encrypted storage, no data resale, auditable logs, and vendor BAAs for telephony/WhatsApp/print. Security/Compliance

Timeline

0–30 days:
  • Ship quick wins (binder generator, scripts, EN/ES summaries)
  • Stand up phone/WhatsApp lines and mail-merge
  • Hire/train first coordinators; finalize consent packets

30–60 days:
  • Launch 50-household pilot (two locales)
  • Go-live Medication Ops MVP; begin KPI tracking
  • Activate ride/clinic contacts and weekly digest

60–90 days:
  • Iterate on SLAs; add billing/EOB assistant MVP
  • Publish pilot outcomes (hours saved, PA time, refill gaps)

90–180 days:
  • Scale to 3–5 markets; refine pricing tiers
  • Explore payer subsidy and community stipends
Research Study Narrative

Objective and context

This programme explored adult children’s pain points in managing aging parents’ care to identify unmet needs and opportunities. Across seven question areas, caregivers consistently described acting as unpaid case managers to compensate for a fragmented system: coordinating medications, appointments, home safety, billing, and records-often via paper binders and local relationships.

What we learned across questions (evidence-backed)

  • System fragmentation and admin burden: Every respondent reported being the “glue” among providers, insurers, and pharmacies-repeating histories, juggling portals/phone trees, and chasing prior auths. As Teresa Aguirre put it, “no hay dueño del caso.”
  • Medication fragility is the acute failure mode: Refills lost between clinic/pharmacy/insurer, stock-outs, and Friday 4:55 p.m. cliffs (“pillbox empty,” Charlotte Muneton). One participant found mom cutting pills in half.
  • Mental load and burnout: Nighttime scenario-running and vigilance erode sleep, work focus, and relationships (“If I miss one dependency… guilt spiral,” Tracy Mcfarlin).
  • Distance and logistics amplify risk: Remote caregivers depend on neighbors/paid locals and panic when comms go silent; rural internet and 2FA failures block portals.
  • What works today: Paper-first “single source of truth” binders/one-page med lists; a tiny, trusted human network (pharmacist, neighbor, one clinic contact); batching and documentation discipline.
  • What fails: Brittle tech and brokered marketplaces (wearables, Wi‑Fi pill dispensers, mail-order meds, paratransit) that add false alarms, logistics mismatches, and opaque fees.

Persona correlations and nuances

  • Rural, church-connected women (mid‑50s): Paper-first, local relationships; want in-person capable support. Value reliability over features (May Miller, Jennifer Kohl).
  • Bilingual Hispanic caregivers: Act as translators/administrators; prefer voice/WhatsApp, EN/ES materials, and culturally competent coordination (Teresa Aguirre, Charlotte Muneton).
  • Technical/PM-oriented professionals: Demand SLAs, measurable outcomes, and robust offline workflows; willing to pay for proven time savings (Joe Deascentis, Gregory Perez).
  • Mid‑income parents juggling work/childcare: Seek simple routines, predictable evening/weekend relief; low tolerance for multi-tap apps (Tracy Mcfarlin, Jill Correa).
  • Long‑distance caregivers: Need a local proxy with visual verification and rapid escalation paths (Gregory Perez, David Gutierrez).

The opportunity and willingness to pay

Caregivers overwhelmingly ask for a single, named, accountable coordinator with phone-first access, who owns medications (reconciliation, refills, prior auths, 72-hour bridges), locks down appointments/transport, and provides plain-English/paper summaries. “Give me one real person… who has the power to fix things,” said Jennifer Kohl. Willingness to pay clusters: ~$30–120 (lite), ~$150–300 (control tower), $300–800+ (concierge months), contingent on SLAs and visible ROI (e.g., 3–5 hours/week back by week 6).

Recommendations for Claude

  • Launch a human-in-the-loop Control Tower: Named, bilingual coordinator per family; phone/WhatsApp-first; month-to-month; SLAs with automatic credits for misses (echoing Teresa’s ask).
  • Medication Ops Engine: Maintain one reconciled med list; trigger refills 7–10 days early; pre-clear prior auths; secure same-day 72-hour bridges (Gregory’s “end the Friday cliff”).
  • Offline-friendly artifacts: Binder/one-page med list generator and EN/ES pre/post-visit summaries; printable evidence trails (timestamps, case numbers) to resolve front-desk disputes.
  • Scheduling and transport orchestration: Stack appointments; confirm accessibility; reliable ETAs with backups; SMS/WhatsApp confirmations.
  • Billing/EOB reconciliation: Intake EOBs/bills, flag mismatches, and generate dispute letters; coordinator closes loops and returns a simple “what you owe.”

Risks and measurement guardrails

  • Authority to act: Standardize HIPAA/POA capture and a caregiver credential packet.
  • Coordinator scalability: Tiered service, tight SLAs, and ops tooling to avoid over-service.
  • External system brittleness: Fax/phone kits, alternate pharmacy playbooks, early triggers.
  • Core KPIs:
    • Caregiver hours saved: ≥3 hrs by day 60; ≥5 by day 120.
    • Refill gap rate: <2% by day 90; <1% by day 180.
    • Prior-auth cycle time: median ≤3 days; P95 ≤7 days.
    • SLA adherence: ≥90% ≤1‑hr callbacks; ≥85% ≤48‑hr standard resolution.
    • Spanish-first task completion: ≥95% without rework.

Next steps (90–180 days)

  1. 0–30 days: Ship binder/med list generator and EN/ES visit summaries; stand up phone/WhatsApp lines; hire/train first coordinators; finalize HIPAA/POA packets.
  2. 30–60 days: Launch 50‑household pilot across two locales (urban bilingual + suburban/rural); go-live Med Ops MVP; activate ride/clinic contacts; begin weekly plain-language updates.
  3. 60–90 days: Add billing/EOB assistant MVP; tune SLAs; publish interim outcomes (hours saved, refill gaps, PA times) to validate ROI and pricing tiers.
  4. 90–180 days: Scale to 3–5 markets; refine tiered pricing and surge coverage; initiate payer subsidy conversations and community micro-stipend partnerships.
Recommended Follow-up Questions Updated Jan 31, 2026
  1. In a typical week, how many hours do you personally spend on each of the following caregiving tasks?
    matrix Quantifies time sinks to prioritize solution scope, staffing, and measurable time-saved outcomes.
  2. Which specific events would most likely prompt you to begin using a paid care coordination service?
    multi select Identifies adoption triggers to target GTM timing, referrals, and partnership channels.
  3. For each task below, how comfortable are you with a coordinator completing it without your involvement?
    matrix Defines delegation boundaries to shape service scope, consent flows, and operating model.
  4. Which authorizations and documents do you currently have in place for your parent's care?
    multi select Assesses onboarding friction and legal prerequisites for acting on the caregiver’s behalf.
  5. For non-urgent requests, what is the maximum acceptable time to full resolution (in hours)?
    numeric Sets concrete SLA targets for staffing, escalation, and credits.
  6. Which proof-of-value outcomes are most and least important when choosing a coordination service?
    maxdiff Prioritizes KPIs and claims to emphasize in product design and marketing.
Suggested matrices: Q1 rows could include medication management, scheduling/appointments, insurance/billing, transportation/errands, provider follow-ups, daily check-ins, document/binder upkeep, in-home safety/maintenance. Q3 rows could include med reconciliation/refills, prior auths, appointment scheduling, pharmacy issue resolution, insurance appeals, provider messaging, attending appointments, arranging transport, in-home safety checks. Q2 triggers could include hospital discharge, new diagnosis, fall/ER visit, major med changes, prior auth denial, caregiver job change/travel, moving parent...
Study Overview Updated Jan 31, 2026
Research question: Identify the most significant pain points, frustrations, and unmet needs of adult children managing care for aging parents, and where the biggest solution opportunities lie.
Research group: 12 U.S. caregivers aged ~45–65 (rural and urban, English/Spanish bilingual mix; local and long‑distance; varied incomes/occupations) actively coordinating medications, appointments, logistics, and finances. What they said: They act as invisible, unpaid case managers because there is no single owner in healthcare; top drags are administrative sludge (portals, phone trees, prior auths), fragile medication/refill chains, and chronic mental load/vigilance.
Distance, uneven family help, language/device gaps, and rural connectivity add risk; most counter with paper-first binders, simple routines, a tiny circle of trusted humans (pharmacist, one MA, neighbors), and avoidance of brittle gadgets.
Outliers highlighted transnational PR logistics, seasonal/weather constraints, and engineering‑style home safety retrofits, with some asking for house‑call capability or a universal caregiver credential. Main insights: Highest-value opportunity is a single named, accountable human coordinator-phone/WhatsApp-first, bilingual, offline-tolerant-with authority and SLAs to own meds (reconciliation, refills, prior auths/72‑hour bridges), scheduling/transport, and billing follow-through; stand‑alone apps are rejected.
Decision takeaways: Launch a human‑in‑the‑loop control‑tower pilot with measurable outcomes (hours saved, refill‑gap rate, prior‑auth cycle time), design offline‑first artifacts (one‑page med list, printable summaries), guarantee Spanish support, and price in clear tiers (~$50–120 basic, $150–300 control‑tower, $300–600 concierge) with month‑to‑month terms and SLA credits, ideally subsidized by payers.