Shared research study link

Wisconsin Voters: 2026 Priorities & Youth Turnout

Understand what Wisconsin voters care about heading into the 2026 midterms. Explore priorities around housing affordability, public schools, gun violence, and the open governor race. Assess whether young voters are energised to turn out for midterms and what messaging would mobilise them.

Study Overview Updated Feb 19, 2026
Research question: What do Wisconsin voters care about heading into the 2026 midterms-especially housing affordability, public schools, gun violence, the open governor’s race, and whether young voters can be mobilized-and what messages move them. Research group: 70 responses from 10 registered voters (ages 18–61) across rural counties and Milwaukee, including rural caregivers/retirees, trades/contractors, small‑business owners, K‑12 staff, and young urban voters.

What they said: Everyday infrastructure failures-unreliable broadband and freeze‑thaw roads-are seen as root problems that magnify cost pressures (groceries, heating, utilities, insurance), with rural health/EMS access and school staffing close behind. Voters want “boring‑competent” governance: concrete plans with timelines, metrics, budgets, and public trackers; the governor matters for tone/vetoes, but most delivery runs through the legislature and budgets. They’re wary of one‑party control yet would tolerate a Democratic sweep on probation if it delivers fast, local, measurable benefits without culture‑war drama; heavy out‑of‑state money triggers distrust unless offset by visible local work and receipts. Young voters say excitement requires transactional wins they feel within months (lower utility/insurance bills, affordable credentials/transit, easier voting) presented via a one‑page “fridge sheet” and live dashboards.

Main insights and takeaways: Center the 2026 offer on basics-roads, reliable rural broadband, EMS/clinic access, and school stability-with dated county deliverables, 90‑day wins (pothole SLAs, outage credits, EMS night‑coverage pilots, special‑ed reimbursement schedule), and strict utility/insurance oversight tied to visible savings. Build trust and turnout with a transparency spine: publish finance mix (favor in‑state small dollars), hold unscreened town halls, and mail simple progress scorecards; keep messaging disciplined on measurable competence and avoid culture‑war detours.
Participant Snapshots
10 profiles
Brandon Palafox
Brandon Palafox

Brandon Palafox, 24, Milwaukee-area field service technician in mining, married with no kids. High-earning, safety-focused homeowner who prizes durable gear and clear value. Budget-conscious DIYer and gamer; uses offline-capable tech; Canadian-born with U.S…

Trenell Orta
Trenell Orta

Trenell Orta, 18, is a Milwaukee-based retail sales associate living in an inherited Riverwest condo. Bilingual and budget-savvy, Trenell Orta is studying for CompTIA A+, values price-to-performance and clear warranties, and balances fitness, gaming, and co…

Gabrielle Booker
Gabrielle Booker

A practical, faith-rooted 24-year-old Orthodox Christian in rural Wisconsin, Gabrielle Booker works remotely in digital banking, lives mortgage-free, budgets tightly, values durability and localism, and balances church, gardening, and outdoor routines with…

Ashley Copley
Ashley Copley

Rural Wisconsin teacher and mom of two. Faith-led, budget-aware, and pragmatic. Values durability, local ties, and clear ROI. Time-constrained, skeptical of subscriptions, and receptive to pilot-proofed, community-endorsed solutions that save time fast.

Betty Savino
Betty Savino

Betty is a retired school office mainstay in rural Wisconsin. Married, no kids, practical and community-minded. Prefers durable goods, clear warranties, and respectful tone. Spends time gardening, quilting, birding, church choir, and caring for her mother.

Betty Crook
Betty Crook

Betty Crook is a Rural Wisconsin QA lead and maker, 51, single, no kids. Practical, community-minded, and budget-savvy. She manages disability with grit, prefers durable and local products, and enjoys woodworking, quilting, road trips, Packers, and quiet wo…

Gideon Hokkanen
Gideon Hokkanen

Gideon is a rural Wisconsin construction site-services lead, 54, single, no kids, owns home with mortgage. Pragmatic, tools-first decision maker; values reliability, local relationships, and clear value; balances long hours with quiet outdoor hobbies and co…

Sonia Schaaf
Sonia Schaaf

57-year-old rural Wisconsin Latter-day Saint, married without children. Former gas station co-manager, now volunteer and household CFO. Pragmatic, frugal, service-oriented. Chooses reliable, well-supported products; avoids subscriptions and complexity; valu…

Angela Baker
Angela Baker

Rural Wisconsin financial analyst, age 30, church-involved and budget-disciplined. Values reliability, clear pricing, and low-friction tools. Outdoors-oriented, family-focused, and practical. Prefers simple, durable products that work with slow internet and…

Olivia Bellmer
Olivia Bellmer

Olivia Bellmer, 48, is a frugal, Hindu, rural Wisconsin homeowner and former paraeducator. Separated with no kids, she volunteers locally, gardens, quilts, and values durability, transparency, and community. Budget, caregiving, and rural access shape her ch…

Overview 0 participants
Sex / Gender
Race / Ethnicity
Locale (Top)
Occupations (Top)
Demographic Overview No agents selected
Age bucket Male count Female count
Participant locations No agents selected
Participant Incomes US benchmark scaled to group size
Income bucket Participants US households
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 ACS 1-year (Table B19001; >$200k evenly distributed for comparison)
Media Ingestion
Connections appear when personas follow many of the same sources, highlighting overlapping media diets.
Questions and Responses
7 questions
Response Summaries
7 questions
Word Cloud
Analyzing correlations…
Generating correlations…
Taking longer than usual
Persona Correlations
Analyzing correlations…

Overview

Wisconsin respondents coalesce around pragmatic, measurable fixes to everyday pocketbook and infrastructure problems rather than culture-war appeals. Across rural and urban areas, voters-especially older rural caregivers and trade workers-prioritise reliable broadband, road maintenance, rural health/eldercare access, and transparent, line‑item accountability. Younger voters (both rural and urban) are potentially energised for the 2026 midterms, but only by transactional, short‑term wins (lower bills, certified job training seats, transit improvements, easier voting access) presented with concrete timelines and public trackers. Skepticism of out‑of‑state money and a preference for local, verifiable evidence of delivery shapes how any messaging or spending is received; successful mobilization will pair ‘boring‑competent’ implementation promises with simple, measurable voter benefits.
Total responses: 70

Key Segments

Segment Attributes Insight Supporting Agents
Rural caregivers & retirees
age range
48–61
locale
Rural
occupation examples
  • Retiree
  • Full‑time family caregiver
  • Community‑involved
household
Owned (mortgage or free & clear)
Primary concerns are rural health/eldercare access, guaranteed EMS/ambulance coverage, expanded clinic and pharmacy hours, and road maintenance. They require multi‑year funding commitments, named contacts and dated deliverables to trust promises. Betty Savino, Betty Crook, Olivia Bellmer, Sonia Schaaf
Young rural professionals
age range
24–30
locale
Rural
occupation examples
  • Operations Specialist
  • Financial Analyst
  • Banking/Operations
priority
Reliable connectivity & predictability
Connectivity reliability (hard SLAs, quarter‑by‑quarter build maps, enforceable penalties) is seen as foundational to keeping jobs and telehealth in rural communities; they respond to technical, enforceable plans rather than aspirational promises. Gabrielle Booker, Angela Baker
Construction/trades & project managers
age range
24–54
industries
  • Commercial Construction
  • Metals & Mining
  • Maintenance
occupation examples
  • Project Manager
  • Maintenance Technician
Frame priorities operationally: workforce pipelines, DSPS licensing timelines, apprenticeship seats, permit predictability, prompt pay and procurement reforms. They want enforceable clocks and metrics that reduce project risk and margin pressure. Gideon Hokkanen, Brandon Palafox
Rural educators / public school staff
age range
40s
occupation
Elementary school teacher
locale
Rural
Key levers are predictable budgets (July 1 deadline), special education reimbursement timelines, reduced administrative burden and staffing support. Concrete budget commitments and staffing dollars are mobilising. Ashley Copley
Young urban / first‑time voters (Milwaukee)
age range
18–24
locale
Milwaukee
occupation examples
  • Sales representative
  • Retail
income bracket examples
$25k–$49k
Prioritise near‑term cost relief (utilities, insurance), transit improvements, and affordable vocational/college options. They are energised by tangible, immediate wins and by easier access to voting (evening early voting, campus drop boxes). Trenell Orta, Brandon Palafox
Small‑business owners / retired small‑ops
age range
50s–60s
occupation examples
  • Small business operator
  • Retiree (community involved)
concerns
  • Insurance cost increases
  • card fees
  • fuel margins
Focus on transparent rate oversight, plain‑English filings, and protections against fee erosion. They respond to line‑item accountability and regulatory fixes that preserve small margins. Sonia Schaaf, Brandon Palafox
Cross‑cutting: Skeptical voters on out‑of‑state money
age range
All ages
locale
Rural & Urban
signal
High distrust of glossy outsider-funded mailers; preference for local endorsements and small‑dollar donor evidence
Out‑of‑state PAC spending undermines credibility broadly; voters across segments award trust to local, verifiable records of delivery and to small‑dollar or in‑community support. Gabrielle Booker, Trenell Orta, Betty Savino, Ashley Copley, Angela Baker, Sonia Schaaf

Shared Mindsets

Trait Signal Agents
Demand for 'boring‑competent' delivery Across ages and locales voters prefer concrete dates, budgets, public trackers, named contacts and one‑page checklists rather than rhetorical grandstanding. Credibility is built with verifiable milestones. Betty Crook, Gabrielle Booker, Ashley Copley, Betty Savino, Gideon Hokkanen
Broadband & connectivity as a rural linchpin Unreliable broadband and data caps are perceived to disrupt telehealth, remote work and schooling; rural respondents want enforceable build maps and penalties for missed commitments. Gabrielle Booker, Angela Baker, Betty Crook, Sonia Schaaf, Betty Savino
Roads / freeze‑thaw maintenance as everyday safety/cost issue Pothole and thaw‑season damage is framed as a recurring safety and budget problem requiring lane‑mile funding and SLA‑style patch targets. Brandon Palafox, Gideon Hokkanen, Angela Baker, Betty Crook
Cost‑of‑living & insurance pressure Rising groceries, heating/fuel and insurance premiums are creating thin financial cushions; voters want rate oversight, escrow protections and transparent filings. Olivia Bellmer, Brandon Palafox, Sonia Schaaf, Trenell Orta
Education staff want predictability School workers seek predictable budgets, timely special education reimbursement and reduced unfunded mandates to keep classrooms staffed and functioning. Ashley Copley
Youth mobilisation is transactional Younger voters are more likely to turn out for concrete near‑term benefits-lower utility bills, cheaper certifications, transit access and simpler voting logistics-rather than ideological messaging. Trenell Orta, Brandon Palafox, Gabrielle Booker
Skepticism of culture‑war messaging Culture‑war stunts are broadly demobilising; the majority prefer policy-focused problem solving that addresses daily life. Betty Savino, Betty Crook, Ashley Copley, Gabrielle Booker, Angela Baker

Divergences

Segment Contrast Agents
Rural caregivers & retirees vs Young urban first‑time voters Rural caregivers prioritise health/eldercare access and road maintenance with a preference for multi‑year funding and named contacts; young urban voters prioritise immediate cost relief (utilities, transit, education/credential affordability) and voting access. Messaging that emphasises long‑term service guarantees resonates with the former but can feel abstract to the latter unless tied to near‑term wins. Betty Savino, Betty Crook, Olivia Bellmer, Sonia Schaaf, Trenell Orta, Brandon Palafox
Construction/trades & project managers vs Household‑focused respondents Trades and project managers frame problems operationally (permitting, prompt pay, apprenticeship seats) and seek procurement reforms; household‑focused respondents frame problems in terms of immediate financial stress and service reliability. Operational fixes may need translation into household impacts to persuade non‑trade voters. Gideon Hokkanen, Brandon Palafox, Olivia Bellmer, Angela Baker
Young rural professionals vs Young urban voters Young rural professionals emphasise connectivity reliability and enforceable SLAs as foundational to work and retention; young urban voters emphasise cost relief and transit. Both are mobilised by measurability, but their prioritized deliverables differ (technical rollout vs bill reduction / transit improvements). Gabrielle Booker, Angela Baker, Trenell Orta, Brandon Palafox
Small‑business owners vs Public‑school staff Small business owners focus narrowly on fee and rate oversight that protects margins; school staff focus on staffing dollars and reimbursement predictability. Both want transparency, but the concrete levers they seek (regulatory filings vs budget deadlines) differ. Sonia Schaaf, Brandon Palafox, Ashley Copley
Creating recommendations…
Generating recommendations…
Taking longer than usual
Recommendations & Next Steps
Preparing recommendations…

Overview

Wisconsin voters want boring‑competent delivery on everyday problems: reliable rural broadband, freeze‑thaw road fixes, staffed EMS/clinics, predictable school funding, and guardrails on utilities/insurance costs. They distrust glossy, out‑of‑state‑funded theatrics and reward concrete plans, dated milestones, public trackers and local presence. This plan packages those insights into fast, ROI‑driven execution: a one‑page county Fridge Sheet, a Basics Tracker, visible rural service wins, youth transactional benefits, and finance transparency that proves local accountability.

Quick Wins (next 2–4 weeks)

# Action Why Owner Effort Impact
1 County ‘Fridge Sheet’ (dates, dollars, names) – Wave 1 Respondents asked for a one‑page, signed plan they can tape to the fridge with who to call, what gets done, and by when. Converts distrust into action. Comms Lead + Policy Director Low High
2 Basics Tracker (MVP) Public, county‑level dashboard showing road patch SLAs, broadband build/outage credits, EMS coverage targets and school budget milestones - receipts over rhetoric. Data/Tech Lead Med High
3 Unscreened Town‑Hall Circuit Trust rises when candidates take open Q&A in school gyms/church basements and post unedited Q&A within 24 hours. Field Director Med High
4 Youth ‘Bills & Badges’ Pop‑ups Young voters mobilize for tangible wins: utility‑bill checkups, free A+ exam vouchers, transit pass sign‑ups, and campus early‑voting info in one stop. Youth Vote Director + Partnerships Lead Med High
5 Finance Sunlight Microsite Publish real‑time donor mix (in‑state vs out‑of‑state), small‑dollar counts, and spend‑to‑field ratio to neutralize the ‘outside money’ trust penalty. Finance & Compliance Lead Low Med
6 ‘Boring‑Competent’ Copy Bank Plain‑language message kit with dates, targets, and consequences, replacing culture‑war noise with checklists voters can verify. Comms Lead Low Med

Initiatives (30–90 days)

# Initiative Description Owner Timeline Dependencies
1 Operational Basics Contract for Wisconsin Package a signed, public pledge focused on Roads–Broadband–EMS–Utilities/Insurance oversight with Day 1–90 actions and county‑specific fridge sheets. Include named contacts, penalties for missed targets (e.g., reallocate admin $$ to asphalt), and quarterly scorecards mailed/emailed. Policy Director + Comms Lead 0–30 days draft and validate; 30–60 days pilot in 10 rural/urban counties; 60–120 days statewide rollout with quarterly updates Candidate/coalition sign‑off, County data (roads, EMS, broadband maps), Legal review on consumer claims
2 Rural Connectivity & Roads Accountability Stack Build a public Basics Tracker: integrate county pothole reports with a 72‑hour SLA, ISP build milestones/outage credits, and cell‑dead‑zone maps. Publish downloadable, offline‑friendly PDFs and SMS updates for low‑bandwidth households. Data/Tech Lead 0–45 days MVP; 45–120 days add cell coverage, outage credits feed, and SMS alerts; 120+ days automate county feeds DOT letting calendars and county lane‑mile data, ISP grant/build disclosures, Civic tech vendor for SMS/IVR
3 Jobsites First: Trades & Permitting Compact Co‑design with contractors: DSPS license clocks, prompt‑pay with automatic interest, retainage caps, and predictable DNR/DOT timelines. Host roundtables, publish a KPI sheet (turnaround times by license/permit), and secure endorsements from local subs and tech colleges. Industry Partnerships Lead + Policy Director 30–60 days stakeholder drafting; 60–120 days public pledge + endorsements; 120+ days legislative/regulatory push & trackers live DSPS/agency data access, Contractor/trades coalition, Tech college partners
4 Youth Transactional Mobilization: Bills, Buses & Badges Deliver immediate benefits: utility‑bill clinics, 3,000+ IT/healthcare exam vouchers, transit pass events, on‑campus early voting tools. Pair with a $25 municipal broadband low‑income plan pledge where feasible. Youth Vote Director 0–30 days secure vouchers/partners; 30–120 days campus/city tour; 120+ days GOTV with incentive reminders Tech colleges (MATC, etc.), Transit agencies, Philanthropic/micro‑grant pool
5 School Stability Pledge Commit to on‑time budget (by July 1), special‑ed reimbursement ramp, phones‑off with funded enforcement, paperwork diet, and mental‑health access SLAs. Launch in 10 pilot districts with public progress dashboards. Education Policy Lead 0–45 days pledge + pilots; 45–120 days expand to 30 districts; 120+ days statewide messaging with receipts District superintendents/boards, Legal review (policy levers), Data‑sharing MOUs
6 Trust Architecture: Endorsements & Funding Guardrails Shift credibility from ads to local validators (EMS chiefs, clinic managers, teachers, small subs). Set a public goal for ≥70% in‑state small‑dollar and a cap on out‑of‑state share, with a rule that every outside dollar is matched by field spending in‑district. Finance & Compliance Lead + Comms Lead 0–30 days policy publish; 30–90 days endorsements pipeline; 90+ days monthly finance transparency updates Endorsement outreach plan, ActBlue/CRM configuration, Compliance counsel

KPIs to Track

# KPI Definition Target Frequency
1 Fridge Sheet Coverage Share of target counties with a published, mailed, or hand‑delivered one‑pager listing dates/dollars/contacts ≥80% of target counties within 45 days; 100% within 90 days Biweekly
2 Basics Tracker Engagement Unique visitors to dashboard + SMS/Email opt‑ins for county alerts 50k uniques and 10k opt‑ins by Day 90; 150k/30k by Day 180 Weekly
3 Local Presence Unscreened town halls held and questions answered on‑mic (no pre‑screen) with posted transcripts ≥30 events and ≥300 total unscreened Qs in 90 days Monthly
4 Small‑Dollar In‑State Share Percent of donations from in‑state small donors (<$200) and out‑of‑state share cap ≥70% in‑state small‑dollar; ≤30% out‑of‑state total Weekly
5 Youth Transactional Outputs Exam vouchers issued + transit pass enrollments from youth pop‑ups 3,000 vouchers and 5,000 transit enrollments by Day 120 Monthly
6 Local Validator Endorsements Count of endorsements from EMS/clinic leaders, teachers, trades/contractors, and tech colleges ≥100 endorsements across ≥40 counties by Day 120 Monthly

Risks & Mitigations

# Risk Mitigation Owner
1 Overpromising on levers that require legislative/regulatory action Use phased, if‑elected/advocacy language, commit to process KPIs (publishing data, holding hearings) and near‑term deliverables under direct control (fridge sheets, trackers, events). Policy Director
2 Data gaps or resistance from ISPs/Agencies for tracker inputs Blend public datasets, FOIA requests, and citizen‑reported potholes/outages; start with MVP metrics and expand as MOUs land. Data/Tech Lead
3 Culture‑war attack cycles drown out basics messaging Pre‑bunk with a ‘Receipts Over Rhetoric’ frame, keep copy disciplined, and route every response back to dated, measurable deliverables. Comms Lead
4 Reliance on out‑of‑state funds damages credibility Set a transparent cap, publish donor heatmaps weekly, and match every outside $1 with $1 in local field; grow small‑dollar in‑state programs. Finance & Compliance Lead
5 Rural skepticism if early wins are not visible Prioritize 10 rural counties for first fridge sheets, visible EMS/clinic hour extensions, and publish after‑hours contact numbers on day one. Field Director
6 Youth pop‑ups seen as gimmicks if benefits lag Distribute vouchers on‑site, confirm sign‑ups via SMS immediately, and post a live counter of benefits delivered by campus/city. Youth Vote Director

Timeline

Weeks 0–2: Stand up copy bank, finance sunlight microsite, and tracker MVP scope.
Weeks 2–4: Mail/hand‑deliver Wave‑1 fridge sheets; launch Basics Tracker MVP in 10 counties; publish first endorsements.
Weeks 4–8: Begin unscreened town‑hall circuit; youth ‘Bills & Badges’ pop‑ups on 5 campuses; add pothole SLA and outage‑credit modules to tracker.
Weeks 8–12: Wave‑2 fridge sheets statewide; Jobsites First compact + trades endorsements; School Stability pilots live.
Weeks 12–24: Scale dashboards (cell dead zones, EMS SLAs), expand youth/events to additional campuses and job hubs; monthly scorecards mailed.
Final 90 days pre‑election: Weekly tracker updates, daily rapid‑response to keep focus on roads, broadband, EMS, schools; GOTV layered atop transactional benefits.
Research Study Narrative

Wisconsin Voters: 2026 Priorities & Youth Turnout - Insight Synthesis

Objective. Understand what Wisconsin voters care about heading into 2026-housing affordability, public schools, gun violence, the open governor race-and assess whether young voters are energised to turn out and what, if anything, would mobilise them.

What matters day to day. Across questions, respondents consistently elevate “boring basics” over rhetoric. The cross‑cutting pain points are unreliable everyday infrastructure-freeze‑thaw roads and broadband-plus sticky cost pressures (groceries, utilities, insurance/escrow). As Gabrielle Booker put it, “Reliable broadband, plain and simple,” and Betty Crook tied buckling county roads to lost hours and missed care. Urban voices add security/theft stress and retail‑pay squeeze (Trenell Orta). The emotional backdrop is anxiety and burnout from “constantly patching problems” rather than seeing systemic fixes.

Governor race and governance style. With Gov. Evers not running, voters prefer steady, technocratic competence over culture‑war theater. They see the legislature and budget mechanics as the real levers, but want a governor who protects operations: roads, broadband, EMS, licensing, schools. “Give me the spreadsheet,” said Ashley Copley. Several call out oversight on utilities/insurance costs (Brandon Palafox) and rural EMS coverage (Betty Savino).

Unified control. Voters are wary of one‑party control but conditionally open if it produces measurable, local benefits fast-no late‑night riders or performative fights. They demand published timelines, KPIs, and receipts. As Gideon Hokkanen warned, a “blank check” risks sloppiness, while Trenell Orta would accept a sweep “to fix basics,” then restore friction.

Costs: housing and groceries. Most report worse or same‑to‑worse trends. Starter homes under $300k “vanish fast” to investors (Palafox), escrow rises with taxes and insurance, and “shrinkflation is clowny” at the register (Orta). Local mitigants (Aldi, co‑ops, farm stands) help, but respondents blame structural drivers: consolidation, investor buying, rate pass‑throughs.

Outside money. Out‑of‑state funding triggers a “trust tax.” Voters scrutinize donor ZIPs, percent out‑of‑state, and visible fieldwork. Trust is rebuilt by plain‑language disclosures, local endorsements, and date‑stamped deliverables (lane‑miles resurfaced, broadband maps, EMS staffing). “Show me outputs … posted and tracked,” said Palafox; Savino color‑codes donor lists.

Personas and nuances.

  • Rural caregivers/retirees (e.g., Betty Savino): 24/7 EMS, clinic hours, road maintenance; want multi‑year funding and named contacts.
  • Young rural professionals (Booker, Angela Baker): reliability SLAs for broadband with build maps and penalties.
  • Trades/project managers (Hokkanen, Palafox): DSPS license clocks, prompt‑pay, retainage caps, predictable permits.
  • Rural educators (Copley): on‑time budgets, special‑ed reimbursements, staffing support, reduced admin load.
  • Young urban/first‑time voters (Orta): near‑term bill relief, transit access, affordable credentials, simpler voting logistics.
  • Small‑business operators (Sonia Schaaf): insurance oversight, fee transparency to protect thin margins.

What cuts through and energises youth

Excitement-not just dutiful turnout-requires a one‑page, signed “fridge sheet” with dates, dollar lines, named contacts, and consequences if targets are missed, plus public dashboards and mailed scorecards. Quick, visible wins (Day‑90 pothole SLAs, first‑year bill relief) and enforceable remedies (“funding shifts from admin to asphalt”) convert attention to enthusiasm (Copley; Palafox).

Recommendations

  • County Fridge Sheets. Mail or hand‑deliver one‑pagers per county listing road projects, broadband milestones/outage credits, EMS coverage standards, and school‑funding timelines with contacts.
  • Basics Tracker. Public dashboard with 72‑hour pothole targets, 10‑year resurfacing maps, ISP build/outage data with automatic credits, and quarterly scorecards.
  • Unscreened town halls. Open Q&A in community venues; post unedited transcripts within 24 hours to counter outside‑money skepticism.
  • Finance sunlight. Real‑time donor mix (in‑state vs out‑of‑state), small‑dollar counts, and spend‑to‑field ratios in plain English.
  • Jobsites‑First compact. Co‑design DSPS license turnaround clocks, prompt‑pay with automatic interest, and retainage caps; publish KPIs by license/permit.
  • School stability pledge. On‑time budget by July 1, special‑ed reimbursement ramp, paperwork diet, and funded classroom enforcement supports.

Risks and guardrails

  • Overpromising on shared levers. Use phased, if‑elected/advocacy language; commit to process KPIs (publishing data, hearings) plus near‑term deliverables under direct control.
  • Data gaps for trackers. Blend public data, FOIAs, and citizen reports; launch MVP metrics, expand via MOUs.
  • Culture‑war noise. Pre‑bunk with a “receipts over rhetoric” frame; route responses back to dated, measurable deliverables.
  • Outside‑funding drag. Set a transparent cap; match each outside $1 with $1 in local field; grow in‑state small‑dollar share.

Next steps and measurement

  1. Weeks 0–2: Stand up Fridge Sheet templates, scope the Basics Tracker MVP, launch finance sunlight page.
  2. Weeks 2–4: Deliver Wave‑1 Fridge Sheets in 10 counties; publish Tracker MVP; schedule first open town halls.
  3. Weeks 4–8: Add pothole SLA/outage‑credit modules; post unedited town‑hall Q&A; begin trades compact roundtables.
  4. Weeks 8–12: Wave‑2 Fridge Sheets statewide; announce School Stability pilots; publish license/permit KPI baselines.
  • KPIs: Fridge Sheet coverage (≥80% of target counties by Day 45), Tracker engagement (50k uniques/10k opt‑ins by Day 90), Local presence (≥30 unscreened events/≥300 on‑mic Qs in 90 days), Small‑dollar in‑state share (≥70%; ≤30% out‑of‑state total).
Recommended Follow-up Questions Updated Feb 19, 2026
  1. Which actions would you most support and most oppose to improve housing affordability in your community? (MaxDiff best/worst) Options: • Legalize duplexes/triplexes and ADUs in single‑family zones • Streamline permits/inspections with firm timelines • Down‑payment assistance for first‑time buyers • Property‑tax credits for owner‑occupied homes • Time‑limited rent cap tied to inflation • Incentives for workforce housing near jobs • Limit bulk investor purchases/short‑term rental conversions • Reh...
    maxdiff Identifies housing levers with broad support to prioritize legislation, local pilots, and campaign promises that feel practical and credible.
  2. Rank your top three priorities for any new K–12 funding in Wisconsin: • Teacher pay and retention • Special education funding • School mental‑health staff (counselors/nurses) • Career and technical education/trades programs • Smaller class sizes in early grades • Building repairs/HVAC • School safety upgrades and threat assessment • Bus routes and driver staffing
    rank Guides budget messaging and where to allocate incremental K–12 dollars for maximum voter resonance and visible impact.
  3. For each of the following gun safety and violence‑reduction policies, indicate your level of support or opposition (Strongly support to strongly oppose): • Universal background checks for all gun sales • Extreme risk protection orders (red‑flag laws) with due process • Safe‑storage requirements with penalties for unsecured access by minors • Mandatory reporting of lost/stolen firearms • Funding community violence‑interruption programs • Expanding school‑based threat assessment and counseling • T...
    matrix Pinpoints executable gun policies with cross‑partisan backing to include or avoid in the platform and legislative agenda.
  4. Which qualities or commitments would most increase your likelihood of supporting a candidate for governor? (MaxDiff best/worst) Options: • Publishes a 100‑day plan with measurable targets and public dashboards • Proven experience managing a large organization or budget • Documented cross‑party negotiating wins • Specific, funded plan for roads and broadband • Pledges to avoid culture‑war fights and focus on basics • Majority of campaign funds from Wisconsin small donors • Holds regular town hall...
    maxdiff Informs candidate positioning, biography emphasis, and early commitments that build trust in the open governor’s race.
  5. If you are 18–29, which obstacles could keep you from voting in the 2026 midterms? Others may select “Not applicable.” (Select all that apply) • Not applicable • Not registered at my current address • Confusing rules or deadlines • No transportation to polling place • Work/class schedule conflicts • Lack of child care/elder care • Don’t feel informed about candidates/issues • Don’t think voting changes anything • Negative tone/culture wars turn me off • Concern about voter ID or documentation •...
    multi select Directs field operations and policy fixes to remove the most common youth turnout blockers ahead of registration and early‑vote windows.
  6. How likely are you to pay attention to election information delivered through each channel? (Very unlikely to very likely) Channels: • Instagram or TikTok posts/DMs • YouTube creators or pre‑rolls • Peer‑to‑peer texts from someone you know • Door‑to‑door conversations with a neighbor • Email or texts from your county/municipal clerk • University/technical college emails or campus orgs • Local newspaper/radio/TV • Reddit/Discord community posts • Workplace or union communications • Church/faith o...
    matrix Optimizes paid and volunteer outreach by channel, especially for younger voters, to increase attention and reduce waste.
These questions fill gaps on schools, gun policy, concrete housing levers, gubernatorial candidate attributes, and youth turnout barriers/channels-directly tied to 2026 priorities and mobilization.
Study Overview Updated Feb 19, 2026
Research question: What do Wisconsin voters care about heading into the 2026 midterms-especially housing affordability, public schools, gun violence, the open governor’s race, and whether young voters can be mobilized-and what messages move them. Research group: 70 responses from 10 registered voters (ages 18–61) across rural counties and Milwaukee, including rural caregivers/retirees, trades/contractors, small‑business owners, K‑12 staff, and young urban voters.

What they said: Everyday infrastructure failures-unreliable broadband and freeze‑thaw roads-are seen as root problems that magnify cost pressures (groceries, heating, utilities, insurance), with rural health/EMS access and school staffing close behind. Voters want “boring‑competent” governance: concrete plans with timelines, metrics, budgets, and public trackers; the governor matters for tone/vetoes, but most delivery runs through the legislature and budgets. They’re wary of one‑party control yet would tolerate a Democratic sweep on probation if it delivers fast, local, measurable benefits without culture‑war drama; heavy out‑of‑state money triggers distrust unless offset by visible local work and receipts. Young voters say excitement requires transactional wins they feel within months (lower utility/insurance bills, affordable credentials/transit, easier voting) presented via a one‑page “fridge sheet” and live dashboards.

Main insights and takeaways: Center the 2026 offer on basics-roads, reliable rural broadband, EMS/clinic access, and school stability-with dated county deliverables, 90‑day wins (pothole SLAs, outage credits, EMS night‑coverage pilots, special‑ed reimbursement schedule), and strict utility/insurance oversight tied to visible savings. Build trust and turnout with a transparency spine: publish finance mix (favor in‑state small dollars), hold unscreened town halls, and mail simple progress scorecards; keep messaging disciplined on measurable competence and avoid culture‑war detours.